The essays correctly identify two tones or sides of the author’s attitude toward the subject in a well-written thesis and deal specifically with narrative techniques such as point of view, syntax, ap lit open essay rubric, detail, and organization. Discussion is likely to be unpersuasive, perfunctory, underdeveloped or misguided.
Generally, essays earning a score of 6 present a more limited analysis and less consistent command of the elements of effective writing than essays scored 7. These papers attempt to explain the passage but do so inaccurately or ineffectively.
Though perhaps not as thorough or precise in their discussion of how the esday tone is revealed in the poem, their dependence on paraphrase, if any, should be in the service of analysis. Generally the prose reveals weak control over writer’s elements as diction, organization, syntax or grammar.
Ap lit open essay rubric papers are specific in their references, cogent in their definitions, and free of plot summary that is not relevant opsn the question. They may deal with fewer narrative techniques, and analysis may be less perceptive or less developed than that of the better essays. Moreover, they seriously misread the passage or fail to respond adequately to the question.
Choices of proof may be less effective than those in range or not from throughout the passage. Frequently, they are unacceptably brief. Part of the question may be omitted altogether.
Tone identification may not be as precise or thesis as ap lit open essay rubric worded as in essays. Although the writers may provide a range of interpretations, these papers will offer a convincing interpretation of the poem as well as consistent control over the elements of effective composition, including the language unique to the criticism of verse.
They may seriously misread the poem. These papers use appropriate choices for quotation or reference ap lit open essay rubric select an appropriate number of choices from throughout the passage. They respond to the assigned task yet probably say little beyond the most easily-grasped openn. These papers are not as thorough, precise, or aware of complexities as the top scoring papers.
These essays are qp not as well-conceived, organized, or developed as upper-half papers. These essays are, at best, superficial.
AP Literature and Composition Rubric
These papers clearly demonstrate an understanding of the passage and recognize its complexity. They may suffer from the cumulative force of many minor misreadings. They usually demonstrate inconsistent control over the elements of composition and are not as well conceived, organized, or developed as the upper-half papers.
Evidence from the text may be meager or misconstrued. These essays are well-written but with less maturity and control than the top papers.
The prose demonstrates an ability to express ideas clearly but with less maturity and control than the top-scoring papers. These essays reflect a sound grasp of this poem; ap lit open essay rubric they are less sensitive to the complexities than the best essays, and their interpretation of the poem may falter in some particulars.
These well-organized and well-written essays clearly demonstrate an understanding of how the poet expresses the complex attitude of the speaker. These essays respond with no more than a reference to the task, contain completely off-topic responses, opeen are blank.
Ap lit open essay rubric papers are still swimming-albeit almost drowning; however, one good kick would put them above water. Although some attempt may have been made to respond to the question, the writer’s assertions are ap lit open essay rubric with little clarity, organization, or support from the text opeen the poem. The analysis may be partial, unconvincing, or irrelevant or it may rely essentially on paraphrase. These lower-half essays reveal an incomplete understanding of the poem and perhaps an insufficient understanding of the prescribed task as well: The writing may convey the writer’s ideas, but it reveals weak control over such elements as diction, organization, syntax or grammar.
Although they may be flawed, the papers, nevertheless, display consistent control over the elements of effective writing and reveal the students’ ability to read with perception and to express ideas with clarity and skill.